Drawing for ATEL LEASING CORPORATION

USPTO serial 76539318

ATEL LEASING CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ATEL LEASING CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vasco H. Morais, Jr.

VASCO H MORAIS JR ATEL CAPITAL GROUP600 CALIFORNIA ST FL 6SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108-2733UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and business management planning for subsidiary companies and affiliates; leasing office fixtures, furniture and equipment; leasing retail store fixtures, furniture and equipmentACTIVEJan 15, 2003
036Acquisition of equipment to be placed on lease financing arrangements with third parties; true lease financing; leases intended as security, lease purchasing financing; all in the fields of construction equipment, mining equipment, containers, telephone and satellite systems, broadcasting equipment, railroad equipment, land vehicles, aircraft, chemical barges, aeronautical equipment, computer equipment, office equipment, hospital and medical equipment, physical therapy equipment, retail store equipment, manufacturing equipment, material handling equipment, processing equipment, scientific measuring equipment, video equipment, bottling and wine processing equipment, and refrigeration equipmentACTIVEJan 15, 2003
037Leasing construction equipment; leasing mining equipment for excavationACTIVEJan 15, 2003
038Leasing telephone, satellite and broadcasting systems and equipmentACTIVEJan 15, 2003
039Leasing aircraft, locomotives, rail cars, rail car movers, railroad tank cars, railroad rolling stock, hoppers, trucks, automobiles, car racks, trucks, lift vehicles, tractors, trailers, chemical barges, and aeronautical equipmentACTIVEJan 15, 2003
042Leasing computer systems equipment and software; leasing medical fixtures, furniture and equipment; leasing agricultural equipment; leasing food and beverage preparation and processing equipment; leasing computer facilities; leasing manufacturing equipment and facilities; leasing material handling equipment; leasing storage tanks; leasing high-tech manufacturing equipment and facilities; leasing printing binding and related equipment; leasing mining equipment for explorationACTIVEJan 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance