USPTO serial 76539455
FLAME FLOW RADIANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLAME FLOW RADIANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Orangeville, Ontario, CA
Orangeville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ms M Lianne Gorelle
MS M LIANNE GORELLE ROBERT CHURCH QC & ASSOCIATES28 FIRST AVEORANGEVILLE, ON L9W 1H8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | gas burners for domestic stoves; barbecue grills, electric cookware, namely, broilers; and outdoor grills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2007 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EX3M | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EX3D | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |