Drawing for SAPPORO RESERVE BEER SINCE 1876 JAPAN'S OLDEST BRAND MORE THAN A CENTURY WITH THE POLARIS EMBLEM

USPTO serial 76539466

SAPPORO RESERVE BEER SINCE 1876 JAPAN'S OLDEST BRAND MORE THAN A CENTURY WITH THE POLARIS EMBLEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAPPORO RESERVE BEER SINCE 1876 JAPAN'S OLDEST BRAND MORE THAN A CENTURY WITH THE POLARIS EMBLEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Conney Porter

KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, NEUSTA1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 24, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 9, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance