USPTO serial 76539514
SUSINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3154495Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2006
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUSINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna A. Rubelmann, Esq.
Donna A. Rubelmann, Esq. Rubelmann & Associates, P.C.501 Herondo Street, Suite #45Hermosa Beach, CA 90254UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SilverPlum Bakery, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SUSINA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SUSINA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SUSINA, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SUSINA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |