Drawing for ALLCOM

USPTO serial 76539574

ALLCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALLCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony G. Eggink

ANTHONY G. EGGINK ANTHONY G. EGGINK & ASSOCIATES3100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING332 MI NNESOTA STREETST. PAUL, MN 55101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer devices, namely, hardware, software and firmware that facilitate remote access communication and management of electro-mechanical devices and/or digital systems equipped with analog and/or digital serial communications protocols using wired, wireless, cellular, or satellite communication mediaABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 26, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 26, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 26, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 16, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 16, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 7, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 12, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance