USPTO serial 76539685
WILD AMERICAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- KING,LINDA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WILD AMERICAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Port Richey, FL
MOUNT PLEASANT, SC
MOUNT PLEASANT, SC
Pensacola, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward T. Hayes
Edward T. Hayes LEAKE & ANDERSSON, LLP1100 Poydras Street, Suite 1700New Orleans, LA, 70163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | shrimp | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Shrimp Alliance
- Other trademarks owned by WILD AMERICAN SHRIMP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WILD AMERICAN SHRIMP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WILD AMERICAN SHRIMP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class A
- Similar marks named WILD AMERICAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |