Drawing for EVERYTHING YOUR DOG NEEDS IN ONE BAG

USPTO serial 76539721

EVERYTHING YOUR DOG NEEDS IN ONE BAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERYTHING YOUR DOG NEEDS IN ONE BAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

Cristina A. Carvalho Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031dog foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 1, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance