Drawing for EVEREST

USPTO serial 76540285

EVEREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVEREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karol A. Kepchar

KAROL A KEPCHAR AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1564UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric kitchen appliances, namely, food processors, juicers, and food and beverage blendersACTIVE—
009hair care appliances, namely, electric hair curling irons and electric hair straightening ironACTIVE—
011Air conditioners, namely, window unit air conditioners, portable air conditioners, and mini-splits, all for domestic use; refrigerated merchandise display cases, refrigerators, refrigerated appliances, namely wine refrigerators; and a full line of electric household appliances, namely, portable heaters, portable air purifiers, portable dehumidifiers, portable humidifiers, fans, thermoelectric can and mug warmers and coolers, hair dryers, range hoods, toaster ovens, toasters, coffee makers, and slow cookersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 30, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance