USPTO serial 76540394
HANAMARU MAKE IT WONDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HANAMARU MAKE IT WONDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kagawa 761-8071, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Franchising, namely offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; business management analysis and business consultancy; market research;business guidance for others in the nature of business planning and business organizational consulting | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services featuring udon noodles (thick white noodles in Japanese style) and providing other foods and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |