USPTO serial 76540506
COLOR OASIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLOR OASIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Haroun
ROBERT M HAROUN SOFER & HAROUN LLP215 Lexington Ave1301NEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stickers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |