Drawing for RACING HIP HOP STYLE

USPTO serial 76540738

RACING HIP HOP STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOYNER, CHARLES G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RACING HIP HOP STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stuart E. Beck

STUART E BECK STUART E. BECK, PCSTE 601ONE PENN CTRPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009video games which are downloadable from the internet or which are stored on CD-ROMs or DVDs and which are played on display devices, namely, computer monitors and television screensACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 31, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 18, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance