Drawing for CHRONOS RICHARDSON

USPTO serial 76540830

CHRONOS RICHARDSON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3405851Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2008
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CHRONOS RICHARDSON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke

Thomas W. Brooke HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLPSUITE 1100800 17TH STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packaging machines, namely, mixing lines, dosing, loose fill bagging, bagging, densification bagging and palletizing equipment in the nature of belt conveyors, motorized leveling devices, robotic palletizing machines, bag placing machines, bulk products filing and densification machines, infeed screw, impeller and packing device for use with fibrous, granular and powder materials but excluding all tobacco productsACTIVE—
009Manual and automatic dosing scales, with or without weight controllers, sold as either a stand-alone unit or integrated within a dosing, loose fill bagging, palletizing or densification systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 30, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 30, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 4, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2014C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 15, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2014815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 31, 2014E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2012CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Sep 13, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 26, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 20, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 3, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 3, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 30, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 30, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance