USPTO serial 76540908
EATING FOR LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EATING FOR LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa A. Osman
LISA A OSMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP370 17TH ST STE 4700DENVER, CO 80202-5647UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Preparations in the nature of ready to eat, cereal derived food bars, processed and breakfast cereals, grain-based chips, grain-based crackers, cake and baking mixes, and cookies | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, vegetable and fruit juices, smoothies, syrups and powders for making fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | restaurant services in the nature of cafes and restaurants serving prepared food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EATING FOR LIFE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by High Point Media, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by High Point Media, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named EATING FOR LIFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |