USPTO serial 76541379
Serial No. 76541379
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76541379?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Nielsen
MARK J NIELSEN LAW OFFICE OF MARK J NIELSEN12351 LK CITY WAY NE STE 203SEATTLE, WA 98125-5437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services; bar services | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |