USPTO serial 76541381
OIL AWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OIL AWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
Thomas I. Rozsa Rozsa Law Group LC18757 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 220Tarzana, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICATED COSMETICS, NAMELY, MEDICATED COSMETIC REMOVERS; MEDICATED EYE CREAMS; MEDICATED COSMETIC FACIAL CLEANERS, MEDICATED SKIN BALANCERS AND MOISTURIZERS; MEDICATED HERBAL BATH GEL FLUID; MEDICATED FOUNDATION MAKEUP; MEDICATED FACE POWDERS; MEDICATED MASCARA; MEDICATED LIP POLISH; MEDICATED LIP GLOSS; MEDICATED EYE MAKEUP POWDERS; MEDICATED EYE SHADOWS; MEDICATED LIP COLOR IN THE FORM OF LIPSTICKS; MEDICATED NAIL ENAMEL; MEDICATED ROUGE; MEDICATED CONTOUR POWDER; MEDICATED EYEBROW PENCILS; MEDICATED CONTOUR POWDERS FOR USE ON CHEEKS; MEDICATED LIP SEALERS; MEDICATED FACE AND BODY CREAMS AND TONERS; AND MEDICATED FACIAL MASKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |