Drawing for MATTRESS PRO

USPTO serial 76541428

MATTRESS PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATTRESS PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth W. King

ELIZABETH W KING KING LAW OFFICE5622 INWOOD DRHOUSTON, TX 77056-4012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020mattresses, beds, bedroom furniture, and bed framesACTIVESep 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 12, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 12, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance