USPTO serial 76541598
CLAY TERRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLAY TERRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa K. Beeman
MELISSA K BEEMAN WOODEN & MCLAUGHLIN LLPONE INDIANA SQ STE 1800INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46280UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Intent to Use) Dry cleaning substances, namely dry cleaning fluids; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip-liner, foundation, blush, eyeshadow, eyeliner and mascara; and perfume | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Pre-recorded compact discs featuring music videos and movies, compact disc players, televisions and video recorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | (Based on Intent to Use) Handbags, purses, umbrellas and wallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | (Based on Intent to Use) Couches, wicker chairs, mirrors and pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on Intent to Use) Clothing, namely, shoes, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jogging suits, jackets, dresses, pants, hats, belts and gloves | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | (Based on Intent to Use) Bats, tennis racquets, tennis balls, basketballs, footballs, workout weights, workout equipment, namely, nautilus machines, sport games and stationery bikes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use in Commerce) Advertising and promotional services for others, namely, display and dissemination of printed and electronic material for retail tenants of shopping centers in the manner of lifestyle centers and business management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Leasing services of shopping center space for lessees of shopping centers in the manner lifestyle centers | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2002 |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Architectural design of shopping centers in the manner of lifestyle and business offices | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2002 |
| 043 | (Based on Intent to Use in Commerce) Contract food and beverage services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clay Terrace Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CLAY TERRACE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |