Drawing for CLAY TERRACE

USPTO serial 76541598

CLAY TERRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLAY TERRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa K. Beeman

MELISSA K BEEMAN WOODEN & MCLAUGHLIN LLPONE INDIANA SQ STE 1800INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46280UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003(Based on Intent to Use) Dry cleaning substances, namely dry cleaning fluids; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip-liner, foundation, blush, eyeshadow, eyeliner and mascara; and perfumeACTIVE—
009(Based on Intent to Use) Pre-recorded compact discs featuring music videos and movies, compact disc players, televisions and video recordersACTIVE—
018(Based on Intent to Use) Handbags, purses, umbrellas and walletsACTIVE—
020(Based on Intent to Use) Couches, wicker chairs, mirrors and pillowsACTIVE—
025(Based on Intent to Use) Clothing, namely, shoes, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jogging suits, jackets, dresses, pants, hats, belts and glovesACTIVE—
028(Based on Intent to Use) Bats, tennis racquets, tennis balls, basketballs, footballs, workout weights, workout equipment, namely, nautilus machines, sport games and stationery bikesACTIVE—
035(Based on Intent to Use in Commerce) Advertising and promotional services for others, namely, display and dissemination of printed and electronic material for retail tenants of shopping centers in the manner of lifestyle centers and business management servicesACTIVE—
036(Based on Use in Commerce) Leasing services of shopping center space for lessees of shopping centers in the manner lifestyle centersACTIVEMar 12, 2002
042(Based on Use in Commerce) Architectural design of shopping centers in the manner of lifestyle and business officesACTIVEMar 12, 2002
043(Based on Intent to Use in Commerce) Contract food and beverage servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance