USPTO serial 76541640
FRANK HERBERT'S DUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRANK HERBERT'S DUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bainbridge Island, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN, DEBAETS, ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and toys, namely, action skill games, board games, role-playing games and role-playing game equipment in the nature of game book manuals; hand held units for playing video games; stuffed toys; plush toys, dolls; playsets for dolls; puppets; toy action figures and accessories therefor; toy action figure cases; flying discs; kites; bath toys; pool floats for recreational use; inflatable toys; toy cube puzzles and manipulative puzzles; jigsaw puzzles; playing cards; yo-yos; pull toys; bean bags; infant rattles; jack-in-the-box; toy musical instruments; balloons; toy building blocks; toy construction blocks and connecting links; sold separately and as kits for construction of toy houses; toy buildings; toy household furnishings; toy robots; toy doll figures and vehicular toys; toy scooters; toy vehicles; remote-control toy vehicles; children's multiple activity toys; baby multiple activity toys; infant toys; sport balls; toy banks; inflatable bath toys; handheld units for playing electronic games; electronic educational game machines for children; stand-alone video games machines; card games and equipment sold as a unit for card games; dice; mobiles for children; toy model airplanes; toy model train sets; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; indoor slumber play tents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |