USPTO serial 76541910
MALLORY VALERIE BLAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MALLORY VALERIE BLAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa M. Allen
MELISSA M. ALLEN ATTORNEY AT LAW3200 WEST END AVENUE, SUITE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry; Plastic necklaces; Plastic bracelets; Plastic rings | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Series of fictional books for children; stationery; note pads; paper goods, namely, art paper, craft paper and drawing paper; stickers | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | Purses | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing for children, namely, t-shirts, dresses, pajamas, underwear, socks; children's halloween costumes; fabric head bands; headbands, bandanas | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, twisters, claw clips, snap clips, hair bands, plastic barrettes, hair bows | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Dolls; stuffed dolls; rubber dolls; rag dolls; plastic dolls; paper dolls; plush toys; doll clothing and doll accessories sold as a unit therewith; puzzles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fassinger, Tami T.
- Other trademarks owned by Fassinger, Tami T.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MALLORY VALERIE BLAIR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |