Drawing for COSMETICS PLUS

USPTO serial 76542363

COSMETICS PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSMETICS PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edmund J. Ferdinand, III

Edmund J. Ferdinand, III Jeffers Cowherd P.C.55 Walls DriveFairfield, CT 06824UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003After-shave lotions, baby oil, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, body cream, body oil, bubble bath, cosmetics compacts, deodorant soap, eau de toilette, eye makeup, face powder, facial creams, hair care preparations, hair conditioners, hair gel, hair mousse, hair shampoo, hair styling preparations, lip gloss, lipstick, skin lotions, hair lotions, facial lotions, body lotions, hair waving lotions, makeup, mascara, nail glitter, nail polish, perfume, personal deodorants, room fragrances, sachets, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion, shaving preparations, shower gel, skin conditioners, skin cream, skin lotion, soaps for hands, face and body, sun screen preparations, and toothpasteACTIVE—
035Mail order catalog services featuring cosmetics, perfume and gifts; mail order services featuring cosmetics, perfume and gifts; retail stores featuring cosmetics, perfume and gifts; and retail store services available through computer communications and interactive television featuring cosmetics, perfume and giftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 12, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 15, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 8, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 14, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance