USPTO serial 76542950
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Turlock, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Sunland, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCUS N. DIBUDUO
MARCUS N. DIBUDUO FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.8080 N. Palm Ave., Third FloorFRESNO, CA 93711United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL APPARATII FOR USE WITH GUITARS [ AND OTHER PURPOSES ]-NAMELY AMPLIFIERS, [ LOUDSPEAKERS, PREAMPLIFIERS, POWER AMPLIFIERS, SIGNAL PROCESSING AMPLIFIERS, AND REVERBERATION UNITS; AND COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES FOR SUCH ELECTRICAL APPARATII-NAMELY, AMPLIFIER CORDS, FOOT PEDAL CONTROLS, SWITCHES, TRANSFORMERS, AMPLIFIER COVERS, AMPLIFIER VOLUME AND TONE CONTROLS, AND SPEAKER CABINETS ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 6, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 6, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 29, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |