USPTO serial 76543072
EZ PACKER BY EZD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2008
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EZ PACKER BY EZD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
Salem, UT
Other trademarks owned by Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
Salem, UT
Other trademarks owned by Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
Salem, UT
Other trademarks owned by Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | inflatable poontoon boat accessories, namely, carriers attached to the back of vehicles and wheels to move around on land by hand | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Edward L. Paxton and Lloyd M. Paxton Partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named EZ PACKER BY EZD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 16, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PGRN | PETITION GRANTED - ISSUE NEW NOA | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |