USPTO serial 76543814
SUNDANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3472718Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNDANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OREM, UT
OREM, UT
Orem, UT
Orem, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bretton L. Crockett
Bretton L. Crockett TechLaw Ventures, PLLC3290 West Mayflower Ave.Lehi, UT 84043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacture of jewels and gems, including diamonds to the specifications of others; and processing of jewels and gems, including diamonds by application of ultra high temperature/ultra high pressure presses to improve the quality and color of such diamonds, gems and jewels | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 2, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Synthetic Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Synthetic Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SUNDANCE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |