USPTO serial 76543954
ASSOCIATED COURIERS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASSOCIATED COURIERS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maryland Heights, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Annette P. Heller
ANNETTE P HELLER14323 S OUTER FORTY DRSTE 512 STOWN & COUNTRY, MO 63017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Courier services, namely the pickup, delivery and storage of medical supplies for use in nuclear medicine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |