Drawing for JOHN WAYNE

USPTO serial 76544017

JOHN WAYNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOHN WAYNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Shay Wald

Jane Shay Wald Irell & Manella LLP1800 Avenue of the StarsSuite 900Los Angeles, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles, structural parts for automobiles, motors for automobiles, and suspension systems for automobilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 30, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 22, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 18, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 27, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 18, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance