Drawing for UNDER THE GUM IRRIGANT

USPTO serial 76544937

UNDER THE GUM IRRIGANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNDER THE GUM IRRIGANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry S. White

BARRY S WHITE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Oral hygiene products for medical use, namely, mouthwashes, antimicrobials and disinfectants in the nature of oral rinses; antiseptics; tonics used to treat gingivitis, periodontitis or halitosis; anti-cavity mouth rinses; toothpastes; tooth cleaners in the nature of an oral rinse; and tongue cleaners in the nature of an oral preparation, excluding toothbrushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 12, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 26, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance