Drawing for MAGVISION

USPTO serial 76545011

MAGVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Guy D. Yale

GUY D YALE ALIX, YALE & RISTAS, LLP750 MAIN STHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photographic apparatus, namely, cameras and digital cameras; computers, notebook computers, computer monitors, and computer peripherals; computer circumjacent equipment, namely, projectors, printers, scanners, computer keyboards, speakers, computer terminals, DVD/CD burners, and web cameras; computer software for operating systems, enterprise resource planning, and customer relations management; electronic dictionaries, modems, and computer network routersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2006ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2005CWBIWITHDRAWN BEFORE REGISTRATION—
Jul 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance