Drawing for UNITED STATES COMEDY TEAM

USPTO serial 76545286

UNITED STATES COMEDY TEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNITED STATES COMEDY TEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori M. Stockton

LORI M STOCKTON BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing television program in the field of comedy; entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing television reality show; entertainment, namely, production of television shows; motion picture film productionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 2, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 26, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 26, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 17, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance