USPTO serial 76545378
GELJET WIDE HEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GELJET WIDE HEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
Peter D. Murray C/O COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products, namely, toners, developers, and fixers and fixing agents for photographic, duplicating, copying, and print purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Toner cartridges for use in copiers and printers, facsimile machines, printing machines; printing pigments, and toner contained in cartridges; inks contained in cartridges and roller cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer printers and parts and accessories therefor, and peripherals for printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Duplicating inks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named GELJET WIDE HEAD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |