USPTO serial 76545412
PAGEANT DIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAGEANT DIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennie Sue Malloy
JENNIE SUE MALLOY YMALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW 3RD AVE HISTORIC CORAL WAMIAMI, FL 33129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and skin care products, namely, lipsticks, eye makeup, mascara, eye liner, lip liner, foundation, body and face powder, blush | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |