USPTO serial 76546582
M META
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M META?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRAD D. ROSE
BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4441UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Candy, candy bars, chewing and bubble gum, caramels, chocolate, chocolate truffles, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate powder, hot chocolate, chocolate chips, peanut butter confectionery chips, pies, cakes, cake and frosting mixes, icing and icing mixes, edible cake decorations, chocolate-based and custard-based fillings for cakes and pies, mixes for bakery goods, pancake mixes, pastries, bakery goods and bakery products, puddings, marshmallows and marshmallow topping, waffles, cookies, crackers, granola-based snack bars, cereal-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, flour-based chips, grain-based chips, wheat-based snack foods, processed cereals and breakfast cereals, oatmeal, grits, processed popcorn, tortilla chips and tortilla shells, taco chips, tortillas, pretzels, corn chips, corn curls, puffed corn snacks, cheese flavored snacks in the nature of cheese curls and cheese balls, toasted corn kernels, corn flakes, corn meal, flour, processed oats and semolina, rice, bread, bread sticks, bread crumbs, croutons, pasta, seasonings, vegetable concentrates used for seasoning, spices, processed herbs, marinades, food starch, natural sweetener, extracts used as flavoring, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes and food flavorings; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler; flavored and sweetened gelatines; flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; gravy mixes, meat pies, meat tenderizers and sweetmeats; corn, maple, chocolate, pancake, topping, table and flavoring syrups; sugar, salt, pepper, ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise, salad dressings, vinegar, sauces and salsa; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; herbal food beverages; grain-based beverages and grain-based food beverages; coffee, coffee beans, coffee substitutes, tea, cocoa and cocoa mixes; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; cracker and cheese combinations; flavored ices, frozen yogurt, frozen confections, ice cream and ice milk; ice cream drinks, ice cream substitute, shakes, custards and cones for ice cream; sandwiches, pizza and dough; macaroni and rice salads; royal jelly for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |