Drawing for DUKE

USPTO serial 76546721

DUKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DUKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan J. Barricella

MICHAEL D ADAMS RUTAN & TUCKER LLP611 ANTON BLVD14TH FLOORCOSTA MESA, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services as Specifically Related to or Associated with the Late American Movie Legend, John WayneABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 3, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 3, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 3, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 30, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 22, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 2, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance