Drawing for BHP

USPTO serial 76547296

BHP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BHP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward A. Kmett

EDWARD A KMETT FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Faucets; Single lever fixtures for lavatories and sinks; Flush levers; Handheld shower heads; Plumbing fittings, namely shower control valves; Plumbing fittings, namely, shower sprayers; Shower head sprayers; Shower heads; Plumbing fittings, namely, sink sprayersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 22, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
May 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance