USPTO serial 76547428
SOCIETY BRAND, LTD.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2005
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOCIETY BRAND, LTD.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
HMX POLAND SP.Z.O.O., LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
Luxembourg, LU
Other trademarks owned by HMX POLAND SP.Z.O.O., LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
EMBU INVESTMENTS SP. Z O.O., BRANCH IN LUXEMBOURG
KROLL, LU
Other trademarks owned by EMBU INVESTMENTS SP. Z O.O., BRANCH IN LUXEMBOURG
EMBU INVESTMENTS SP. Z O.O., BRANCH IN LUXEMBOURG
KROLL, LU
Other trademarks owned by EMBU INVESTMENTS SP. Z O.O., BRANCH IN LUXEMBOURG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Guibert Richard
Guibert Richard HMX POLAND SP.Z.O.O., LUXEMBOURG BRANCHALLEE SCHEFFER STREET NO. 1LUXEMBOURG, L-2520LUXEMBOURGGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's clothing; namely, suits, vests, sport coats, overcoats and trousers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 1926 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hart Schaffner & Marx
- Other trademarks owned by Hart Schaffner & Marx
- Other trademarks owned by Hart Schaffner & Marx
- Other trademarks owned by HMX POLAND SP.Z.O.O., LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
- Other trademarks owned by ABG HMX, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HMX, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EMBU INVESTMENTS SP. Z O.O., BRANCH IN LUXEMBOURG
- Other trademarks owned by EMBU INVESTMENTS SP. Z O.O., BRANCH IN LUXEMBOURG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SOCIETY BRAND, LTD.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 27, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |