Drawing for IMAGIO

USPTO serial 76547784

IMAGIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SANDRA EPP RYAN

STEVEN M AUVIL BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF L2300 BP TWR200 PUBLIC SQCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care preparations and non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, shampoos, hair conditioners, hair spray, hair styling gel, hair coloring products, hair permanent wave preparations, spray gels, skin creams, cleansing lotions, sunscreens, preparations to assists in tanning the skin, moisturizers, body gel, hand soap, personal deodorants, toothpaste, non medicated mouth wash, face toner, eye makeup remover, foaming bath cream, men's and women's shave gel, men's post shave, men's and women's shower gels, facial scrubs, hand and body lotions, cleansing creams, and night creams, make-upsACTIVE—
008Hair salon equipment, namely, scissors, hair clippers, hair trimmers; and razorsACTIVE—
009Hair salon equipment, namely, electric hair curlers and electric hair curling irons, and electrically-heated hair rollersACTIVE—
011Hair salon equipment, namely, hand-held electric hair dryers, and stationary hair dryers for commercial and domestic useACTIVE—
021Hair salon equipment, namely, hair brushes, hair combs, shaving brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance