USPTO serial 76547918
BAJA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAJA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald K. White
GERALD K WHITE GERALD K. WHITE & ASSOCIATES, PC205 W RANDOLPH ST STE 835CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Cigars; cigarettes; loose, smokeless, and chewing tobacco; matches; cigarette and cigar lighters not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIME TIME INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SINGLE STICK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SINGLE STICK, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named BAJA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |