Drawing for VERO MODA

USPTO serial 76548244

VERO MODA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERO MODA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bassam N. Ibrahim

BASSAM N IBRAHIM BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[Based on Intent-to-Use only] Soaps; perfume; essential oils for personal use, including bath, baby, and body oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; and dentifricesACTIVE—
009[Based on Intent-to-Use only] Spectacles, spectacle frames, tinted eyeglasses and sunglassesACTIVE—
014[Based on Intent-to-Use only] Rings being jewelry; necklaces; bracelets; jade; precious gemstones; artificial precious gem stones; pins being jewelry; bob ties with precious metal tips; earrings; pearls; artificial jewels for fashion use; jewel ornaments of precious metal; agates; jewelry, namely, amulets; chronometric instruments, namely, watches, time pieces and clocks; household utensils of precious metal; household ornaments of precious metalACTIVE—
018[Based on Intent-to-Use and Section 44(e)] Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk; bags, namely hand bags, overnight bags; trunks; traveling bags; leather, textile, and canvas shopping bags; purses; wallets; umbrellas; parasols; school bags; briefcases; vanity cases sold empty; suitcases; luggage; leather key holdersACTIVE—
020[Based on Intent-to-Use only] IvoryACTIVE—
025[Based on Intent-to-Use and Section 44(e)] Skirts, jeans, safari-style clothing, namely shirts, jackets, hats, dresses, skirts, shorts, and trousers; jackets, overcoats, one-piece dresses, blouses, two-piece dresses, hats, gloves, sweatshirts, polo-style shirts, blousons, and sweaters; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, and sandalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2006INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Aug 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 21, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Oct 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance