USPTO serial 76548330
ULTRAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STX Protective Apparel Inc./STX Vetements de Protection Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by STX Protective Apparel Inc./STX Vetements de Protection Inc.
SPERIAN PROTECTIVE APPAREL INC./SPERIAN VETEMENTS DE PROTECTION LTEE
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN PROTECTIVE APPAREL INC./SPERIAN VETEMENTS DE PROTECTION LTEE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics for the manufacture of protective clothing and accessories, namely, fabric resistant to fire, heat, water, perforation, chemicals, gases, germs, bacteria, blood and body fluids for the manufacture of coats, hats, helmets, jackets, vests, pants, boots, shirts,socks, stockings, under-tops, under bottoms, wet suits and body suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STX Protective Apparel Inc./STX Vetements de Protection Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN PROTECTIVE APPAREL INC./SPERIAN VETEMENTS DE PROTECTION LTEE
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ULTRAFLEX
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |