Drawing for TIDAL NETWORKS

USPTO serial 76548434

TIDAL NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TIDAL NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn Freedman

LAURA C GUSTAFSON PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPCALENDAR/DOCKETING DEPT PO BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009network security systems that monitor, detect and respond to internal security breaches comprising, namely, of computer chipsets and security softwareABANDONED—
040custom manufacture of computer chipsets and network security systems for othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 9, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 6, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance