Drawing for FAMILY VALUES

USPTO serial 76548909

FAMILY VALUES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAMILY VALUES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ELECTRIC APPLIANCES, NAMELY, RICE COOKERS, DEEP FRYERS, WOKS, PRESSURE COOKERS, FRYING PANS, GRILLS, SANDWICH MAKERS, WAFFLE MAKERS, ICE CREAM MAKER, BREAD MAKER, CONVECTION OVEN, COFFEE MAKER, FOOD DEHYDRATOR, RICE WARMER, SOUP WARMER, YOGURT MAKER, ROASTER OVEN, TOASTER OVEN, PORTABLE RANGE, SLOW COOKER AND TOASTERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 7, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2006PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Oct 2, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 8, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 29, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 18, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 3, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance