USPTO serial 76548910
CHANG'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHANG'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRIC APPLIANCES, NAMELY, RICE COOKERS, DEEP FRYERS, WOKS, PRESSURE COOKERS, FRYING PANS, GRILLS, SANDWICH MAKERS, WAFFLE MAKERS, ICE CREAM MAKER, BREAD MAKER, CONVECTION OVEN, COFFEE MAKER, FOOD DEHYDRATOR, RICE WARMER, SOUP WARMER, YOGURT MAKER, ROASTER OVEN, TOASTER OVEN, PORTABLE RANGE, SLOW COOKER AND TOASTER | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | NON-ELECTRICAL PRESSURE COOKERS, CITRUS JUICERS, RICE/BEAN DISPENSERS, SKILLETS, WOKS, SAUCE PANS, PASTRY BLENDERS, FOOD MILLS, PANCAKE TURNERS, SPATULAS, BASTING SPOONS, APPLE CORERS, CHEESE GRATERS, VEGETABLE-CLEANING BRUSH, PASTRY BRUSH, CAN OPENERS, JAR-TOP OPENERS, BOTTLE OPENERS, COLANDERS, PEPPER GRINDERS, CHOPPING BOWLS, BAKING PANS, OMELET PANS, NONELECTRIC GRIDDLES, MEAT GRINDERS, COFFEE POTS, TEA KETTLES, ICE CRUSHERS, DUTCH OVENS, GARLIC PRESS, FLOUR SIFTERS, WIRE WHISKS, STRAINERS, MOULI GRATERS, FOOD CANISTERS, COMBS AND SPONGES; BRUSHES FOR COOKING, COOKWARES, NAMELY, POTS AND PANS, PORCELAIN, EARTHENWARE DISHES, PAILS, IRON PANS, ALUMINUM PANS, PLASTIC PANS, CANDLE EXTINGUISHERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, DISH STANDS, NAPKIN HOLDERS, PAPER TOWEL HOLDERS, CUTTING BOARDS, JUICE PITCHERS, COOKIE JARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIRAMA ENTERPRISES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MIRAMA ENTERPRISES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CHANG'S CHOICE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |