Drawing for EONX

USPTO serial 76548935

EONX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EONX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David P. Miranda

DAVID P MIRANDA HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI PC5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203-5160UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail services, namely retail store services and retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents, in the field of fuel cells and power cells, energy generating devices, systems, components, cartridges, refueling devices, interconnects, systems, subsystems and energy sources, namely fuel cells, power cells, batteries and energy storage devices for portable electronic devices, fuel refilling devices, smart interconnect devices for connecting fuel supplies and fuel cells; import and export services in the field of fuel cells, power cells and energy related products and servicesACTIVE—
042Design services, namely design and testing for new product development and design and testing services for others; engineering services, energy and science consulting services, product testing services for new product development and testing of products for others, import and export services, energy and scientific research services, all in the fields of fuel cells, power cells and energy related products and servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance