USPTO serial 76549070
NATREL FINE FILTERED MILK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 15, 2009
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATREL FINE FILTERED MILK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Granby, Quebec, J2G 7G2, CA
Granby, Quebec, J2G 7G2, CA
Granby, Quebec, J2G 7G2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N. QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP2000 MARKET STREET, 10TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy beverages, namely flavored milk, fortified milk, lactose serum beverages, namely, enriched milk, lactose-reduced milk, fluid milk, filtered milk | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |