USPTO serial 76549117
MONET'S PALATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONET'S PALATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Schechter
KENNETH L. WILTON SEYFARTH SHAW LLP2029 CENTURY PARK EASTSUITE 3300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | dinnerware made of china, namely cups and plates, decorative glass and ceramic storage jars, serving trays not of precious metal, drinking glasses, cups, glass mugs, ceramic mugs, ceramic and glass beverage trays, pitchers, commemorative plates, serving platters and dishes not of precious metal, cutting boards, bowls, dishes, canvas wine bottle bags, rolling pins, wine cooler caddies, chopping boards, plastic, glass and ceramic tumblers, glasses and mugs, beverage coolers, drinking stems, mugs, paper cups, saucers, decanters, flasks, pewter mugs, shakers made of wood, shakers made of ceramic, napkin holders, trivets, dinner bells, liquor sets consisting of decanters and glasses, vases, canister, ceramic plates, ceramic figurines, ceramic stems, porcelain plates, porcelain figurines, porcelain trinket boxes, glass plates, porcelain ells, buckets, carafes, creamer sets made of glass, ceramic or crystal, cookie jars, candy jars, polyurethane beverage can holders, insulated bags for food, beverages and ice, glass jars sold empty, insulting sleeve holders for beverage cans and insulated sleeve holders for wine bottles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |