Drawing for MONET'S PALATE

USPTO serial 76549120

MONET'S PALATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONET'S PALATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth L. Wilton

Kenneth L. Wilton Seyfarth Shaw LLP2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500Los Angeles, CA 90067-3021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033distilled spirits, brandy and calvadosACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Dec 3, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 29, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Nov 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jun 2, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 2, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Jun 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 24, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Nov 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 19, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 18, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITIONโ€”
Aug 18, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 18, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Jun 3, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIPโ€”
Aug 28, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Aug 28, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Aug 28, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Aug 18, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jun 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKSโ€”
Apr 23, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Apr 23, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999โ€”
Apr 4, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Apr 4, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Apr 4, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Mar 30, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Dec 23, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Oct 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jun 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jun 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance