Drawing for CAFE DEMONTE

USPTO serial 76549215

CAFE DEMONTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAFE DEMONTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christonher J. Day

CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY301 E BETHANY HOME RD STE A-213PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CoffeeACTIVESep 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 16, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 5, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 3, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 3, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 31, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance