USPTO serial 76549217
AUTHENTIC ITALIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTHENTIC ITALIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E Peirce
Jay K. Meadway, Esq. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.P.Two liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed fruits and vegetables, prepared fruits and vegetables, luncheon meats, sardines, processed peas, pickled green salad, canned tomatoes, organic canned tomatoes; crushed tomatoes, tomato paste, tomato puree, edible oils, namely, olive oil, blended oil, corn oil, canned anchovies, canned clams, clam juice, canned mussels, canned tuna fish, seafood salad, canned chick peas, processed beans, canned and jarred peppers, stuffed peppers, processed pimientos, pepperoni, giardineira, processed pignoli nuts, processed escarole, processed eggplant, processed artichokes, processed mushrooms, cheeses, namely Romano and parmesan, pickled vegetables, soups, chicken broth, processed olives, processed garlic, caponata, pickles and pickle chips | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 2003 |
| 030 | pasta sauce, clam sauce, tomato sauce, pizza sauce, vinegar, capers, bread crumbs, parsley, oregano, Italian seasoning, basil, bay leaves, rosemary, dehydrated onion powder, garlic powder, canned minced garlic; ground black pepper, red crushed ground pepper and dried hot chili pepper; pastry confections, pizza, Arborio rice, prepared spaghetti sauce, espresso coffee, canned pesto sauce, cherry and grenadine syrups for flavoring, panettone cake, cannoli shells, torrone candy, candy, cookies, pasta; spices | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |