USPTO serial 76549222
FREEDEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEDEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Mennenga
CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electromagnetic tracking technology for use in medical applications, namely, software used to position and track the position of patients and the position of tools and instruments used in image guided surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electromagnetic tracking technology for use in medical applications, namely, apparatus consisting of sensors, detectors, cables and displays used to track the position of patients and the position of tools and instruments used in image guided surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by General Electric Company
- Other trademarks owned by General Electric Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named FREEDEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |