Drawing for SIDE WINDER

USPTO serial 76549424

SIDE WINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIDE WINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANK J. DYKAS

FRANK J DYKAS DYKAS SHAVER & NIPPER LLPPO BOX 877BOISE, ID 83701-0877UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007DIAMOND IMPREGNATED SAW BLADES FOR USE WITH POWERED SAWS AND USED FOR CUTTING BOTH GREEN AND CURED CONCRETE AND ASPHALTACTIVENov 10, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 2, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 2, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance