USPTO serial 76549463
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dynacrete International Incorporated
Qualicum Beach, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dynacrete International Incorporated
Dynacrete International Incorporated
West Vancouver, BC, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dynacrete International Incorporated
C. DARELL AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED
WEST VANCOUVER, BC, CA
Other trademarks owned by C. DARELL AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED
Dynacrete International Incorporated
Qualicum Beach, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dynacrete International Incorporated
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
Tanya M. Reitzel Coastal Trademark Services1081 Cambie StreetVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5L7CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | (Based on 44e and on Use) [ Surface applied rust converters and inhibitors; polymer additives added to sand and cement for repairing or overlaying concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, metal, and asphalt; Premixes of polymer, sand and cement for repairing or overlaying concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, metal, and asphalt; Sealers and coatings, namely, penetrating sealer, hardener and strengthener for concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, metal, and asphalt;] Penetrating sealers and top sealers for concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, [ metal, and asphalt; Clear and colorable sealers for concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, metal, and asphalt;] Coatings that water proof and petrify woods; Wear resistant clear and colorable [ bonding ] coatings for concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, [ metal, and asphalt; Colorable polymer coatings with ceramic platelets for concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, metal, and asphalt;] [Repair and renovation systems comprising coatings, paints, and instruction manuals for crack repair, crack proofing,] [ joint fillings,] [mortar repair, mortar overlay and mortar resurfacing, industrial floor resurfacing, asphalt repair and resurfacing, structural wood deck surfacing,] [ metal coating, decorative surfacing, pool deck resurfacing,] [bridge deck repair and resurfacing, parking structure repair and resurfacing, below grade water vapor control system vapor emission treatment, graffiti protection] [ and removal, tile setting ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 25, 2002 |
| 003 | [ (Based on 44e) Cleaners, namely, surface cleaners for concrete, masonry, brick, block, stone, wood, metal, and asphalt ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |